A stochastic model to analyze the dynamics of poverty and social mobility in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18381/eq.v23i1.7366Keywords:
Pobreza, Movilidad social, cadenas de Markov, MéxicoAbstract
Objective: To propose a model based on non-homogeneous Markov chains to analyze social mobility and the transitions between the categories of poverty defined by the National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy in México. Methodology: A non-homogeneous Markov chain approach is employed to project the overall proportions of the population across categories of poverty and vulnerability. Transition probabilities are adjusted using observed data to ensure an accurate match between the model’s projections and actual proportions. Results: The projections reveal significant disparities between regions in México. Northern states show a higher proportion of non-poor and non-vulnerable populations, while southern states exhibit the highest levels of extreme and moderate poverty. Limitations: The model may be constrained by the quality and availability of the observed data used to adjust the transition probabilities, as well as by unaccounted variations in underlying social and economic dynamics. Originality: This work introduces a novel approach by applying non-homogeneous Markov chains to analyze social mobility and poverty transitions in the context of México. It also incorporates data-driven adjustments to transition probabilities to ensure precise projections. Conclusions: The projections highlight the regional heterogeneity of social mobility in México, emphasizing the need for targeted public policies that address the specific needs of each region, particularly in the most disadvantaged areas.Downloads
References
Aguilar-Cruz, F., & Pérez-Mendoza, J. S. (2017). Movilidad Social en México. La educación como indicador de desarrollo y calidad de vida. Opción, 33(84), 664-697. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/310/31054991024/
Blumen, I., Kogan, M., & McCarthy, P. J. (1955). The industrial mobility of labor as a probability process. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. (Cornell studies in industrial and labor relations, v. 6). Disponible en University Microfilms (1971).
Breen, R. (1994). Individual level models for mobility tables and other cross-classifications. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(2), 147-173. DOI: 10.1177/0049124194023002001
Breen, R., Mood, C., & Jonsson, J. O. (2016). How much scope for a mobility paradox? The relationship between social and income mobility in Sweden. Sociological Science, 3, 39-60. DOI: 10.15195/v3.a3
Butaeva, K., Chen, L., Durlauf, S. N., & Park, A. (2025). A tale of two transitions: Mobility dynamics in China and Russia after central planning. BFI Working Paper (2025-110). https://bf i .uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BFI_WP_2025-110.pdf
Ciaschi, M., Serrano, J., Neidhöfer, G. (2025). Educational and income mobility in Mexico: Early gains, recent challenges. Documento de trabajos (06/2025). (Accessed: 2025-08-29). Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias (CEEY). https://ceey.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/06-Ciaschi-et-al-2025.pdf
Claussen, B., Smits, J., Naess, Ø., & Smith, G. D. (2005). Intragenerational mobility and mortality in Oslo: Social selection versus social causation. Social Science and Medicine, 61(12), 2513-2520. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.045
Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias. (s.f.). Movilidad social. Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias. https://ceey.org.mx/movilidadsocial/
Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias. (2019). Informe de movilidad social en México 2019.
Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias. https://ceey.org.mx/informe-de-movilidad-social-Mexico-2019/
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. (2018). Análisis de la pobreza 2018. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/MP/Paginas/AEpobreza2018.aspx
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. (2022). Análisis de la pobreza 2022. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación
de la Política de Desarrollo Social. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/MP/Paginas/AEpobreza2022.aspx
CONEVAL. (2008). Metodología para la medición multidimensional de la pobreza en México. 3 ed. México: CONEVAL. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/MP/Paginas/Metodologia.aspx
CONEVAL. (2018). Nota técnica sobre la medición multidimensional de la pobreza, 2018-2020 [Consultado el 5 de diciembre de 2024]. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/
MP/Documents/MMP_2018_2020/Notas _pobreza _2020/Nota_tecnica_medicion_multidimensional_de_la_pobreza_2018_2020.pdf
CONEVAL. (2020a). Medición de la pobreza: Glosario [Consultado el 5 de diciembre de 2024]. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/Paginas/Glosario.aspx
CONEVAL. (2020b). Medición de la pobreza: Pobreza
en México. [Consultado el 5 de diciembre
de 2024]. https://www.coneval.org.mx/
Medicion/Paginas/PobrezaInicio.aspx
Costa-Ribero, C. A. (2007). Class, race, and social mobility in Brazil. Dados, 3(se), 1-29. http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?pid= S0011-52582007000100008&script=sci_arttext
El Colegio de México. (s.f.). Movilidad social en México. El Colegio de México. https://movilidadsocial.colmex.mx/
Eyles, A., Major, L. E., & Machin, S. (2022). Social mobility – past, present and future. London: The Sutton Trust. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SocialMobility-%E2%80%93-Past-Present-and-Future.pdf
Featherman, D. L., Jones, F. L., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). Assumptions of social mobility research in the U.S.: The case of occupational status. Social Science Research, 4(4), 329-360. DOI: 10.1016/0049-089X(75)90002-2
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Luijkx, R., & Treiman, D. J. (1989). Intergenerational class mobility in comparative perspective. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 8, 3-84. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/intergenerational-classmobility-in-comparativeperspective
Ginsberg, R. B. (1971). Semi-Markov processes and mobility. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 233-262. DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989799
Ginsberg, R. B. (1972). Critique of probabilistic models: Application of the Semi-Markov model to migration. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 63-82. DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989803
Goldthorpe, J. H. (2016). Social class mobility in modern Britain: changing structure, constant process. Journal of the British Academy, 4(89-111). https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/1060/05_Goldthorpe_1825.pdf
Grusky, D. B., & Hauser, R. M. (1984). Comparative social mobility revisited: Models of convergence and divergence in 16 countries. American Sociological Review, 49(1), 19-38. DOI: 10.2307/2095555
Heckman, J., & Mosso, S. (2014). The economics of human development and social mobility. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 689-733. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040753
Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad. (2019). Informe movilidad social México 2019 (vía CEEY). Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad. https://imco.org.mx/informe-movilidad-social-Mexico-2019-viaceey/
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2016). Encuesta intercensal 2015: Movilidad y migración social. Principales resultados. Sistema Nacional de Información Estadística y Geográfica. https://www.snieg.mx/Documentos/Demografico/sesiones/doc_12017/5_MMS_2016_Principalesresultados.pdf
McGinnis, R. (1968). A stochastic model of social mobility. American Sociological Review, 33(5), 712-722. DOI: 10.2307/2092882
Messmacher Linartas, M. (2000). Desigualdad Regional en México. El efecto del TLCAN y otras reformas estructurales. Documento de investigación. (2000-4). Banco de México,
Dirección General de Investigación Económica. https://www.banxico.org.mx/publicacionesy-prensa/documentos-de-investigacion-delbanco-de-mexico/%7BADD2ECA6-2BF7-8AF0-7A1C-4F7A34B525BC%7D.pdf
Rincón, L. (2007). Introducción a los procesos Estocásticos. UNAM, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Matemáticas. http://lya.fciencias.unam.mx/lars/libros/procesos.pdf
Rojas Aguilar, J. L. (2014). Modelando la pobreza multidimensional: un análisis estocástico. European Scientific Journal, 10(4), 54-69. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/2681/2533
Singer, B., & Spilerman, S. (1973). Social mobility models for heterogeneous populations. Sociological methodology, 5, 356-401. DOI: 10.2307/270841
Singer, B., & Spilerman, S. (1976). The representation of social processes by Markov models. American Journal of Sociology, 82(1), 1-54. DOI: 10.1086/226269
Song, X. (2021). Multigenerational social mobility: A demographic approach [Tesis doctoral, University of Pennsylvania]. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/e911e661-2532-453c-ba42-0ac7f3ad3e44/download
Sorokin, P. A. (1927). Social mobility. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Sorokin, P. A. (1953). Estratificación y movilidad social. Revista mexicana de sociología, 15(1), 83-117. DOI: 10.2307/3537850
Sorokin, P. A. (1954). Segunda parte. Movilidad social. Capítulo VII: Movilidad social, sus formas y fluctuación. Revista Mexicana de sociología, 16(2), 279-310.
Spaseski, N., & Hasanovic, I. (2016). Intergeneration social mobility as a Markov process. Southeast Europe Journal of Soft Computing, 5(2), 34-37. DOI: 10.21533/scjournal.v5i2.123
Spilerman, S. (1972). The analysis of mobility processes by the introduction of independent variables into a Markov chain. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 277-294. DOI: 10.2307/2093468
Van Leeuwen, M. H. D., & Maas, I. (2010). Historical studies of social mobility and stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 429-451. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102635
Vélez, R., Stabridis, O., & Minor, E. (2018). Still looking for the land of opportunity: Regional differences in social mobility in Mexico. Sobre México. Temas de Economía, 4(1), 54-69. http://ri.ibero.mx/handle/ibero/4778
Venkatachalapathy, R. (2020). Revisiting Markov Models of Intragenerational Social Mobility. En T. Carmichael & Z. Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the Computational Social Science Society of the Americas (pp. 133- 144). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35902-7
Wright, E. O. (1997). Class counts: Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yaish, M., & Andersen, R. (2012). Social mobility in 20 modern societies: The role of economic and political context. Social Science Research, 41(3), 527-538. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.12.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luz Judith Rodríguez Esparza, Dolly Anabel Ortiz Lazcano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.