Actitudes discriminatorias, decisiones de empleo y fijación de salarios en el lugar de trabajo: evidencia de viñetas experimentales en un país en desarrollo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18381/eq.v23i2.7386Resumen
Objetivo: Estudiamos cómo las características demográficas personales de un trabajador afectan la fijación de salarios y las decisiones de empleo entre el personal de una muestra aleatoria de empresas del sector servicios en la Ciudad de México. Metodología: Utilizamos viñetas experimentales y análisis de regresión multivariada. Resultados: Controlando por una medida explícita de pro- ductividad, encontramos una penalización discriminatoria en el empleo de 11% para trabajadores provenientes de Centro y Sudamérica. También existe una penalización del 9% para trabajadores con rostros asimétricos, la cual se presenta únicamente cuando los operativos toman decisiones de despido. En cuanto a los salarios, encontramos una penalización del 2.6% para trabajadores con rostros asimétricos en la muestra de operativos, pero ningún efecto significativo en la muestra de gerentes. Originalidad: Se utiliza un novedoso diseño de viñetas experimentales para el análisis. Conclusiones: Existe evidencia contundente de que la fijación salarial y las decisiones de despido están afectadas por actitudes o prejuicios discriminatorios en el sector servicios de la Ciudad de México.Descargas
Citas
Adams, E. F. (1977). An investigation of the influence of job level and functional specialty on job attitudes and perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 335-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.335
Ahmad, A. (2020). Ethnic discrimination against second-generation immigrants in hiring: empirical evidence from a correspondence test. European Societies, 22(5), 659-681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1822536
Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(1), 93-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268432
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Antonioni, D., & Park, H. (2001). The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Management, 27(4), 479-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206301027004
Arceo-Gomez, E. O., & Campos-Vazquez, R. M. (2014). Race and marriage in the labor market: a discrimination correspondence study in a developing country. American Economic Review, 104(5), 376-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.376
Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. En O. Ashenfelter & A. Rees (eds.). Discrimination in labor markets (pp. 1-33). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology, 6(3), 128-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000014
Baert, S. (2018). Hiring discrimination: An overview of (almost) all correspondence experiments since 2005. En S. M. Gaddis (ed.). Audit studies: behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 63-77). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_3
Bamberger, P. A., Erev, I., Kimmel, M., & Oref-Chen, T. (2005). Peer assessment, individual performance, and contribution to group processes: the impact of rater anonymity. Group & Organization Management, 30(4), 344-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104267619
Bandiera, O., Barankay, I., & Rasul, I. (2009). Social connections and incentives in the workplace: evidence from personnel data. Econometrica, 77(4), 1047-1094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6496
Banerjee, A., Bertrand, M., Datta, S., & Mullainathan, S. (2009). Labor market discrimination in Delhi: evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 14- 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.002
Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berkowitz, L., & Donnerstein, E. (1982). External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. American Psychologist, 37(3), 245-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.3.245
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? a field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 991-1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
Blommaert, L., Coenders, M., & van Tubergen, F. (2014). Ethnic discrimination in recruitment and decision makers’ features: evidence from laboratory experiment and survey data using a student sample. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 731-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0329-4
Bodvarsson, Ö. B., & Partridge, M. D. (2001). A supply and demand model of co-worker, employer and customer discrimination. Labour Economics, 8(3), 389-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00029-4
Bokemper, S. E., Descioli, P., & Kline, R. (2019). Unfair rules for unequal pay: wage discrimination and procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 6(3), 180-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2019.11
Bol, J. C. (2011). The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1549-1575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10099
Booth, A. L., & Leigh, A. (2010). Do employers discriminate by gender? A field experiment in female-dominated occupations. Economics Letters, 107(2), 236-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.034
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, J. S., & Hunter, W. G. (2005). Statistics for experimenters: design, innovation, and discovery (2 ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Brown, C. (2022). Understanding gender discrimination by managers [Chicago: The author]. https://christinalbrown.github.io/gender_disc_paper.pdf
Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 225-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297110
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648-659.
Dulleck, U., Fooken, J., & He, Y. (2020). Hukou status and individual-level labor market discrimination: An experiment in China. ILR Review, 73(3), 628-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919887118
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. En P. A. David & M. W. Reder (eds.). Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89-125). New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7
Edwards, A. L. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(2), 90-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058073
Finseraas, H., Johnsen, Å. A., Kotsadam, A., & Torsvik, G. (2016). Exposure to female colleagues breaks the glass ceiling: evidence from a combined vignette and field experiment. European Economic Review, 90, 363-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.010
Fisher, R. A. (1942). The design of experiments. Edimburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
Galarza, F. B., & Yamada, G. (2014). Labor market discrimination in Lima, Peru: evidence from a field experiment. World Development, 58, 83- 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.003
Gatskova, K. (2021). Gender wage gap and gender attitudes in Ukraine. En T. Karabchuk, K. Kumo, K. Gatskova, E. Skoglund (eds.) Gendering post- Soviet space: demography, labor market and values in empirical research (pp. 181-194). Cham: Springer.
Gomila, R. (2021). Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(4), 700-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4gmbv, 2019
Graham, W. K. (1969). Comparison of job attitude components across three organizational levels. Personnel Psychology, 22(1), 33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1969.tb02053.x
Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2395-2400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112
Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1993). Beauty and the labor market. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers (4518). DOI https://doi.org/10.3386/w4518
Harper, B. (2000). Beauty, stature and the labour market: a British cohort study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62(s1), 771-800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0620s1771
Hazucha, J. F., Hezlett, S. A., & Schneider, R. J. (1993). The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32(2-3), 325-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930320210
Hsieh, C.-T., Hurst, E., Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J. (2019). The allocation of talent and US economic growth. Econometrica, 87(5), 1439- 1474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11427
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [INEGI] (2025). DENUE, Directorio estadístico nacional de unidades económicas. Aguascalientes: INEGI.
Jowell, R., & Prescott-Clarke, P. (1970). Racial discrimination and white-collar workers in Britain. Race, 11(4), 397-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030639687001100401
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kübler, D., Schmid, J., & Stüber, R. (2018). Gender discrimination in hiring across occupations: a nationally-representative vignette study. Labour Economics, 55, 215-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2018.10.002
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153
Loewenstein, G. (1999). Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. The Economic Journal, 109(453), 25-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00400
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: a free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122-1135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
Maurer-Fazio, M. (2012). Ethnic discrimination in China’s internet job board labor market. IZA Journal of Migration, 1(1), Article 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9039-1-12
McCarthy, A. M., & Garavan, T. N. (2001). 360° feedback process: Performance, improvement and employee career development. European Journal of Training and Development, 25(1), 5-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590110380614
McDonald, P. (2019). How factorial survey analysis improves our understanding of employer preferences. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 237-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2019-0011
Mellahi, K., & Harris, L. C. (2016). Response rates in business and management research: An overview of current practice and suggestions for future direction. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 426-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12154
Miranda Caso Luengo, A., Aguilar-Rodríguez, A., Zizumbo Colunga, D., & Sainz-Santamaría, J. (2019). Diversidad y discriminación en las empresas del sector servicios de la Ciudad de México. México: SeGob, Consejo Nacional para Prevenir la Discriminación (CONAPRED). https://sindis.conapred.gob.mx/wp-content/ploads/2020/01/Discriminacion_Empresas.Ax_.pdf
Mobius, M. M., & Rosenblat, T. S. (2006). Why beauty matters. American Economic Review, 96(1), 222-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157515
Mujica, C. A., & Bridges, A. J. (2023). Horizontal and vertical racial/ethnic discrimination: attributions and impact. Cham: Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33058-2_1
Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913646
Neumark, D. (2018). Experimental research on labor market discrimination. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 799-866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20161309
Oesch, D., Lipps, O., & McDonald, P. (2017). The wage penalty for motherhood: evidence on discrimination from panel data and a survey experiment for Switzerland. Demographic Research, 37, 1793-1824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.56
Petit, P. (2007). The effects of age and family constraints on gender hiring discrimination: a field experiment in the French financial sector. Labour Economics, 14(3), 371-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2006.01.006
Reingen, P. H., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Social perception and interpersonal influence: some consequences of the physical attractiveness stereotype in a personal selling setting. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(1), 25-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80073-3
Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2006). An experimental investigation of sexual discrimination in hiring in the English labor market. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 6(2, Advances), art. 1. https://fieldexperiments-papers2.s3.amazonaws.com/papers/00329.pdf
Roscigno, V. J. (2019). Discrimination, sexual harassment, and the impact of workplace power. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic
World, 5, 1-13. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2378023119853894
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. (1974). Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(1), 9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035834
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. (1977). Too old or not too old? Harvard Business Review, 55(6), 97-106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ177598
Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B. (1982). The factorial survey approach: an introduction. En P. H.
Rossi & S. L. Nock (eds.). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 15-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rousseau, D. M. (1978). Characteristics of departments, positions, and individuals: contexts for attitudes and behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 521-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392578
Smith, V. L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. The American Economic Review, 72(5), 923-955. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812014
Starmer, C. (1999). Experimental economics: hard science or wasteful tinkering? The Economic Journal, 109(453), 5-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00398
Valle, M., & Bozeman, D. P. (2002). Interrater agreement on employees’ job performance: review and directions. Psychological Reports, 90(3), 975-985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3.975
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. 3 ed. New York: W. W. Norton.
Weichselbaumer, D. (2020). Multiple discrimination against female immigrants wearing headscarves. ILR Review, 73(3), 600- 627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919875707
Weiss, E. M., & Maurer, T. J. (2004). Age discrimination in personnel decisions: a reexamination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(8), 1551-1562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02786.x
Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extra-role behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 98-107. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1994-31626-001
Wooldridge, J. M. (2007). Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics, 141(2), 1281-1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.02.002
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Alfonso Miranda, Daniel Zizumbo-Colunga, Adriana Aguilar-Rodríguez, Jaime Sainz Santamaría
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
