Efectos espaciales directos e indirectos de la variedad industrial en el empleo y la creación de empresas en la Megalópolis del Valle de México, 2010 – 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18381/eq.v19i2.7262Palabras clave:
Variedad relacionada y no relacionada, Efectos espaciales, Especialización inteligenteResumen
Objetivo. Analizar los efectos espaciales de la variedad industrial en el crecimiento del empleo y creación de empresas manufactureras, de 2010 a 2019, en la Megalópolis del Valle de México. Metodología. Los efectos se estiman mediante modelos espaciales Durbin, que permiten identificar interacciones espaciales de distinto tipo. Resultados. Los resultados indican efectos directos positivos de la variedad sobre el crecimiento del empleo y la creación de empresas. Limitaciones/implicaciones. El análisis se limita por la falta de datos sobre la relación tecnológica. Sin embargo, se elaboran sugerencias de política definidas a partir de la teoría de la especialización inteligente. Originalidad/valor. Es el primer análisis econométrico-espacial desagregado sobre el impacto de la variedad industrial en el empleo y la creación de empresas, y único en su tipo en México. Conclusiones. La variedad industrial incentiva las tasas de crecimiento de empleo y empresas en la megalópolis. La concentración manufacturera también interviene en los efectos de la variedad (no) relacionada sobre estas tasas de crecimiento.Descargas
Citas
Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., y Jakobsen, S. E. (2016). Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy, 45(4), 844-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013.
Alhusen, H., Bennat, T., Bizer, K., Cantner, U., Horstmann, E., Kalthaus, M., Proteger, T., Sternbeg, R. y Töpfer, S. (2021). A new measurement conception for the ‘doing-using-interacting’ mode of innovation. Research Policy, 50(4). https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104214.
Anselin, L. (2001). Spatial econometrics. En Baltagi, B (Ed.). A companion to theoretical econometrics. 310-330. https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470996249.
Anselin, L. (2021). Spatial Models in Econometric Research. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acrefore/9780190625979.013.643.
Asheim, B. T. (2018). Learning regions–a strategy for economic development in less developed regions? En Passi, A., Harrison, J., y Jones, M. (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of regions and territories, 130-140. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/978 1785365805.00020.
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., y Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional studies, 45(7), 893- 904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404. 2010.543126.
Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past–present– future. En Shearmur, R., Carrincazeaux, C. y Doloreux, D. (Eds.), Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, 45-62. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710774.
Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., y Rigby, D. L. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252-1268. https://doi.org/10.10 80/00343404.2018.1437900.
Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., y Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907-920. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598.
Bishop, P. (2012). Knowledge, diversity and entrepreneurship: a spatial analysis of new firm formation in Great Britain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(7-8), 641- 660. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.617786.
Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. J., Gómez-Rubio, V., y Pebesma, E. J. (2008). Applied spatial data analysis with R. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01247_1.x.
Bivand, R., G. Millo, y G. Piras. (2021). A Review of Software for Spatial Econometrics in R. Mathematics 9(11):1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/ math9111276.
Boschma, R. (2005) Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment, Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74, https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Boschma R, Iammarino S (2009) Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy. Economic Geography 85 (3): 289-311.
Boschma, R., Minondo, A., y Navarro, M. (2012). Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 241-256. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1435- 5957.2011.00387.x.
Cainelli, G., y Ganau, R. (2019). Related variety and firm heterogeneity. What really mattersfor shortrun firm growth? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(9-10), 768-784. https://doi. org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1571636.
Capasso, M., Cefis, E., y Frenken, K. (2016). Spatial differentiation in industrial dynamics. The case of the Netherlands (1994–2005). Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 107(3), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12151.
Capello, R., y Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393-1406. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058.
Caragliu, A., de Dominicis, L., & de Groot, H. L. (2016). Both Marshall and Jacobs were right! Economic Geography, 92(1), 87-111. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1094371.
Colombelli, A. (2016). The impact of local knowledge bases on the creation of innovative start- ups in Italy. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9722-0.
Content, J., Frenken, K., y Jordaan, J. A. (2019). Does related variety foster regional entrepreneurship? Evidence from European regions, Regional Studies, 53:11, 1531- 1543. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00343404.2019.1595565.
Content, J., y Frenken, K. (2016). Related variety and economic development: a literature review. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2097-2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517.
D’Adda, D., Guzzini, E., Iacobucci, D., y Palloni, R. (2019). Is Smart Specialisation Strategy cohe- rent with regional innovative capabilities? Regional Studies, 53(7), 1004-1016. https://doi. org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1523542.
De Groot, H. L., Poot, J., & Smit, M. J. (2016). Which agglomeration externalities matter most and why? Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(4), 756- 782.https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12112.
Dzemydaitė, G. (2021). The Impact of Economic Specialization on Regional Economic Development in the European Union: Insights for Formation of Smart Specialization Strategy. Economies, 9(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/ economies9020076.
Ejdemo, T., y Örtqvist, D. (2020). Related variety as a driver of regional innovation and entrepreneurship: A moderated and mediated model with non-linear effects. Research Policy, 49(7), 104073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2020.104073.
Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spatial economic analysis, 5(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421770903541772.
European Commission (2022). Smart Specialisation Platform Disponible en línea: https://s3platform. jrc.ec.europa.eu/. Consultado el 11/04/2022.
Ferreira, J. J., Farinha, L., Rutten, R., y Asheim, B. (2021). Smart Specialisation and learning regions as a competitive strategy for less developed regions. Regional Studies, 55(3), 373-376. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1891216.
Firgo, M., y Mayerhofer, P. (2018). (Un) related variety and employment growth at the sub‐ regional level. Papers in Regional Science, 97(3), 519-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12276.
Foray, D. (2014). Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773063.
Frangenheim, A., Trippl, M., y Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the single path view: Interpath dynamics in regional contexts. Economic geography, 96(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130 095.2019.1685378.
Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., y Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety andregional economic growth. Regional studies, 41(5), 685-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296.
Galindo Pérez, M. C., Pérez Campuzano, E., & Suárez Lastra, M. (2020). Movilidad intrarregional en la región Centro de México, 2000-2015. Investigaciones geográficas, (102). https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.60093.
Gianelle, C., Kyriakou, D., McCann, P., y Morgan, K. (2020). Smart Specialisation on the move: reflections on six years of implementation and prospects for the future. Regional Studies, 54:10, 1323-1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00343404.2020.1817364.
Gonzalez, A. V., Mack, E. A., y Flores, M. (2017). Industrial complexes in Mexico: implications for regional industrial policy based on related variety and smart specialization. Regional Studies, 51(4), 537-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00343404.2015.1114174.
Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., y Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257-274. https:// doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012.
Grillitsch, M., y Asheim, B. (2018). Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1638-1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/096543 13.2018.1484892.
Guo, Q., He, C., y Li, D. (2016). Entrepreneurship in China: The role of localisation and urbanization economies. Urban Studies, 53(12) 2584-2606. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098015595598.
Halleck- Vega, S., y Elhorst, J. P. (2015). The SLX model. Journal of Regional Science, 55(3), 339- 363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12188.
Hassink, R., y Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049-2065. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898.
Henderson, J. V. (2007). Understanding knowledge spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(4), 497-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.11.010.
Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., y Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482- 487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581.
Hirsch, J., y Rosas Rodríguez, B. (2018). Especialización inteligente: un diagnóstico sobre la especialización y diversificación en México. Revista de economía, 35(90), 51-85. https:// doi.org/10.33937/reveco.2018.91.
Iacobucci, D., y Guzzini, E. (2016). Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: Missing links in S3 design and implementation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1511-1526. https://doi. org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108.
INEGI (2010). Censo de Población 2010. Principales resultados por AGEB y manzana urbana. Disponible en https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2010/. Consultado el 06/10/2021.
INEGI (2018). Sistema de Clasificación de América del Norte (SCIAN 2018). Disponible en https:// www.inegi.org.mx/app/scian/. Consultado el 06/25/2021.
INEGI (2019). Sistema Automatizado de Información Censal (SAIC) de los Censos Económicos. Disponible en https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/saich/v2/. Consultado el 06/30/2021.
INEGI (2020). Directorio Estadístico de Unidades Económicas (DENUE). Disponible en https:// www.inegi.org.mx/app/mapa/denue/default.aspx. Consultado el 06/27/2021.
INEGI (2021). Repositorio para descarga del Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/descarga/default.html. Consultado el 06/30/2021.
Kasmi, F. (2021). Milieu–Innovative Milieu: The Strength of Proximity Ties. En Uzundis, D., Kasmi, F., y Adatto, L. (eds.), Innovation Economics, Engineering and Management Handbook 2: Special Themes, 195-200. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781119832522.ch23.
Kelejian, H. H., y Prucha, I. R. (2010). Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressivemodels with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. Journal of econometrics, 157(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.10.025.
Klepper, Steven. “Spinoffs: A review and synthesis.” European Management Review 6.3 (2009): 159- 171. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.18.
Kuusk, K., y Martynovich, M. (2021). Dynamic Nature of Relatedness, or What Kind of Related Variety for Long‐Term Regional Growth. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 112(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ tesg.12427.
Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography – Rethinking regional pathdependence: beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic geography, 86(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x.
McCann, P., y Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Transforming European regional policy: a results-driven agenda and smart specialization. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(2), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grt021.
Miguelez, E., & Moreno, R. (2018). Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional studies, 52(5), 688-701. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478.
Moreno‐Brid, J. C. (2013). Industrial Policy: A Missing Link in Mexico’s Quest for Export‐led Growth. Latin American Policy, 4(2), 216-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12015.
Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R., Lundquist, K. J., y Olander, L. O. (2011). The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of in- dustries. Regional studies, 45(1), 49-65. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x.
OCDE (2009), OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Mexico 2009, OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy, OECD Publishing, París. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264075993-en.
Van Oort, F., de Geus, S., y& Dogaru, T. (2015). Related variety and regional economic growth in a cross-section of European urban regions. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1110-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014. 905003.
Ye, X., y Rogerson, P. (2021). The Impacts of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) on Omission Error. Geographical Analysis. https:// doi.org/10.1111/gean.12269.
Yeung, H. W. C. (2021). Regional worlds: from related variety in regional diversification to strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Studies, 55(6), 989-1010. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1857719.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 José Antonio Cabrera Pereyra
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El contenido publicado en EconoQuantum se encuentra bajo una Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
