Small-scale farmers’ willingness to adopt chemical-free inputs and engage in collaborative arrangements –A discrete choice experiment in Central Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18381/eq.v19i2.7254Keywords:
Chemical-free inputs, collaborative arrangements, discrete choice experiment, latent class logit, small-scale farmers, Mexico.Abstract
Objetive: Explore small-scale Mexican farmers’ willingness to adopt chemical-free fertilizers and pesticides, and to engage in two collaborative arrangements. Methodology: A discrete choice experiment has been designed based on two non-monetary attributes (use/no use of chemical inputs and two collaborative arrangements) and a monetary attribute (percentage change in price of crop that generates most of net revenues). Data has been analyzed with a two-class latent class logit specification. Findings: 60% of respondents is not willing to transition to a chemical-free input regime, is willing to receive management support from municipality, and is not interested in a shared insurance. On the opposite side of the preferences, 40% of respondents is willing to adopt chemical-free inputs, is not interested in management support, and is willing to participate in a shared insurance. Limitations: Our sample is not nationally representative, and further studies are needed to corroborate and generalize our findings. Contribution: This is the first study exploring whether preferences of small-scale farmers in Mexico align with Federal government’s goal of phasing out glyphosate. Conclusions: With 40% of small-scale farmers willing to adopt chemical-free inputs, if the Federal government wants to convice the other 60% of phasing out glyphosate, a possibility is to implement a slower strategy that starts with providing management support. Once management support is in place, and trust is gained, doors may open for a transition to chemical-free production regimes.Downloads
References
Alló, M., Loureiro, M.L. and Iglesias, E., 2015. Farmers' Preferences and Social Capital Regarding Agri-environmental Schemes to Protect Birds. Journal of agricultural economics, 66(3), pp.672-689.
Andersson, H., Larsén, K., Lagerkvist, C.J., Andersson, C., Blad, F., Samuelsson, J. and Skargren, P., 2005. Farm cooperation to improve sustainability. Ambio, pp.383-387.
Arrona-Rivera, A.E., Enríquez, P.L., García-Feria, L.M., Orellana, S.A. and von Osten, J.R., 2016. Organochlorine pesticides in the ferruginous pygmy owl (Glaucidium brasilianum) in Chiapas, Mexico. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 97(3), pp.337-345.
Artz, G., Colson G. and Ginder, R., 2010. A Return of the Threshing Ring? A Case Study of Machinery and Labor-Sharing in Midwestern Farms. Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics, 42(4), pp.805-819.
Asai, M., Langer, V. and Frederiksen, P., 2014. Responding to environmental regulations through collaborative arrangements: Social aspects of manure partnerships in Denmark. Livestock Science, 167, pp.370-380.
Ben-Akiva, M.E., 1972. The structure of travel demand models. Ph. D. dissertation, System Division, Department of Civil Engineering, M.I.T.
Bennett, M.T., Gong, Y. and Scarpa, R., 2018. Hungry Birds and Angry Farmers: Using Choice Experiments to Assess “Eco-compensation” for Coastal Wetlands Protection in China. Ecological Economics, 154, pp.71-87.
Blasch, J., van der Kroon, B., van Beukering, P., Munster, R., Fabiani, S., Nino, P. and Vanino, S., 2022. Farmer preferences for adopting precisionfarming technologies: a case study from Italy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 49(1), pp.33-81.
Christensen, T., Pedersen, A.B., Nielsen, H.O., Mørkbak, M.R., Hasler, B. and Denver, S., 2011. Determinants of farmers’ willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones—A choice experiment study. Ecological Economics, 70(8), pp.1558-1564.
Chèze, B., David, M. and Martinet, V., 2020. Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment. Ecological Economics, 167, p.106349.
Danne, M., Mußhoff, O. and Schulte, M., 2019. Analysing the importance of glyphosate as part of agricultural strategies: A discrete choice experiment. Land Use Policy, 86, pp.189-207.
Díaz, G., Ortiz, R., Schettino, B., Vega, S. and Gutiérrez, R., 2009. Organochlorine pesticides residues in bottled drinking water from Mexico City. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 82(6), pp.701-704.
DOF –Diario Oficial de la Federacion—, 2020. Decreto por el que se establecen las acciones que deberán realizar las dependencias y entidades que integran la Administración Pública Federal, en el ámbito de sus competencias, para sustituir gradualmente el uso, adquisición, distribución, promoción e importación de la sustancia química denominada glifosato y de los agroquímicos utilizados en nuestro país que lo contienen como ingrediente activo, por alternativas sostenibles y culturalmente adecuadas, que permitan mantener la producción y resulten seguras para la salud humana, la diversidad biocultural del país y el ambiente. Available at [last retrieved: 04/10/2021] http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle. php?codigo=5609365&fecha=31/12/2020
El Siglo de Torreon, 2021. Gobierno emite decreto para eliminar uso del glifosato en México. Available at [last retrieved: 04/10/2021] https://www.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/no ticia/1805696.gobierno-emite-decreto-para-eliminar-uso-del-glifosato-en-mexico.html
Espinosa-Goded, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J. and Ruto, E., 2010. What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. Journal of Agricultural economics, 61(2), pp.259-273.
Feil, J.H., Anastassiadis, F., Mußhoff, O. and Kasten, P., 2015. Analyzing farmers' preferences for collaborative arrangements: An experimental approach (No. 1510). Diskussionspapiere, Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung. Available at [last retrieved: 12/20/2018] https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/119403
Granados-Galván, I.A., Rodríguez-Meza, D.G., Luna-González, A. and González-Ocampo, H.A., 2015. Human health risk assessment of pesticide residues in snappers (Lutjanus) fish from the Navachiste Lagoon complex, Mexico. Marine pollution bulletin, 97(1-2), pp.178-187.
Greiner, R., 2015. Motivations and attitudes influence farmers' willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Agricultural Systems, 137, pp.154-165.
Greiner, R., 2016. Factors influencing farmers’ participation in contractual biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment with northern Australian pastoralists. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 60(1), pp.1-21.
Greiner, R., Bliemer, M. and Ballweg, J., 2014. Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation. Journal of Choice Modelling, 10, pp.34-45.
Haab, T. and McConnell, K., 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources. The econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar.
INEGI –Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informmatica—, 2019. Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria 2019. Available at [last retrieved: 02/10/2022] https://www.inegi.org.mx/ programas/ena/2019/#Tabulados
Jaeck, M. and Lifran, R., 2014. Farmers’ preferences for production practices: a choice experiment study in the Rhone river delta. Journal of agricultural economics, 65(1), pp.112-130.
Johnston, R.J., Boyle, K.J., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T.A., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R. and Tourangeau, R., 2017. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), pp.319-405.
Khan, M. and Damalas, C.A., 2015. Farmers' willingness to pay for less health risks by pesticide use: A case study from the cotton belt of Punjab, Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 530, pp.297-303.
Lagerkvist, C.J. and Hansson, H., 2012. Machinerysharing in the presence of strategic uncertainty: evidence from Sweden. Agricultural economics, 43, pp.113-123.
Larsén, K., 2007. Participation, incentives and social norms in partnership arrangements among farms in Sweden. Selected paper at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting. Available at [last retrieved: 12/20/2018] https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/1740/
Larsén, K., 2008. Economic consequences of collaborative arrangements in the agricultural firm. PhD Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics. Available at [last retrieved: 12/20/2018] https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/1740/
Larsén, K., 2010. Effects of machinery-sharing arrangements on farm efficiency: evidence from Sweden. Agricultural Economics, 41(5), pp.497-506.
Martínez-Cruz, A.L. and Núñez, H.M., 2021. Tension in Mexico's energy transition: Are urban residential consumers in Aguascalientes willing to pay for renewable energy and green jobs?. Energy Policy, 150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2021.112145
McFadden, D., 1973. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Available at [last retrieved: 12/20/2018] https://eml.berkeley. edu/reprints/mcfadden/zarembka.pdf
McFadden, D., 1995. Computing willingness-to-pay in random utility models. mimeograph, Department of Economics, University of California. Available at [last retrieved: 05/14/2019] https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/37c2/cc0a245fb9df8be3ea340eacb3a696a9a068.pdf
McFadden, D., and Train, k., 2000. Mixed MNL models of discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15, pp. 447–470.
Navntoft, S., Sigsgaard, L., Nimgaard, R., Esbjerg, P., Kristensen, K., Andresen, L., and Johnsen, I., 2009. Buffer zones for biodiversity of plants and arthropods: is there a compromise on width?. Pesticides Research No. 127 2009. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Available at [last retrieved: 12/19/2018] https://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publications/2009/978-87-92617-09-5/pdf/978- 87-92617-10-1.pdf
Reynolds, J.F., Smith, D.M.S., Lambin, E.F., Turner, B.L., Mortimore, M., Batterbury, S.P., Downing, T.E., Dowlatabadi, H., Fernández, R.J., Herrick, J.E. and Huber-Sannwald, E., 2007. Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. science, 316(5826), pp.847-851.
Ruto, E., and Garrod, G., 2009. Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(5), pp.631-647.
Schulz, N., Breustedt, G. and Latacz-Lohmann, U., 2014. Assessing farmers' willingness to accept “greening”: insights from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Journal of agricultural economics, 65(1), pp.26-48.
Train, K., 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press.
Tur-Cardona, J., Bonnichsen, O., Speelman, S., Verspecht, A., Carpentier, L., Debruyne, L., Marchand, F., Jacobsen, B.H. and Buysse, J., 2018. Farmers' reasons to accept bio-based fertilizers: A choice experiment in seven different European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, pp.406-416.
Uthes, S. and Matzdorf, B., 2013. Studies on agri-environmental measures: a survey of the literature. Environmental management, 51(1), pp.251-266.
Vidogbéna, F., Adégbidi, A., Tossou, R., Assogba-Komlan, F., Ngouajio, M., Martin, T., Simon, S., Parrot, L. and Zander, K.K., 2015. Control of vegetable pests in Benin–Farmers' preferences for eco-friendly nets as an alternative to insecticides. Journal of environmental management, 147, pp.95-107.
Villanueva, A.J., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Arriaza, M. and Rodríguez-Entrena, M., 2015. The design of agri-environmental schemes: Farmers’ preferences in southern Spain. Land Use Policy, 46, pp.142-154.
Villanueva, A.J., Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Arriaza, M. and Gómez-Limón, J.A., 2017. Heterogeneity of farmers' preferences towards agri-environmental schemes across different agricultural subsystems. Journal of environmental planning and management, 60(4), pp.684-707.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sergio Colin Castillo, Naím Manríquez García, Adan L. Martinez-Cruz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
