Do corporations care? Corporate Social Responsibility and firm’s engagement

Eugenia Suarez Moran

Resumen


What are the firm’s determinants to engage in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)? Under what conditions is it likely to occur? Evidence suggests three possible mechanisms that affect a firm’s engagement in csr: the role of growth in value added within an industry, peer effects and workers’ attitudes. Results are consistent with the institutional framework theory, which suggests that firms engage in CSR practices in times of economic prosperity. Further evidence shows that peer effects are also relevant on a firm’s decision to take part in csr. Regarding workers’ attitudes, this paper provides evidence of a weak link between labor force preferences and a firm’s decision to engage in CSR.


Palabras clave


Business cycle; Corporate Social Responsibility; institutional economics

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Anguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855-879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bagnoli, M. & Watts, S.G. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12 (3), 419-445.

Belu, C. & Manescu, C. (2013). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and economic performance. Applied Economics, 45 (19), 2751-2764.

Branca, A.S., Pina, J., & Catalao-Lopes, M. (2012). Corporate giving, competition and the economic cycle. Working Paper, nos. 0874-4548.

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 946-967.

Cao, J., Liang, H. & Zhan, X. (2015). Peer effects of Corporate Social Responsibility. Management Science.

Driscoll, J. C. & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 40 (4), 549-560.

Fernandez-Kranz, D. & Santalo, J. (2010). When necessity becomes a virtue: The effect of product market competition on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19 (2), 453-487.

Frynas, J. G. & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics, A European Review. 25 (3): 258-285.

Galaskiewicz, J. & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes and interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34 (3), 454-479.

Hsiang-Lin, C., Hsiang-Hsuan, C., & Tzu-Yin, C. (2010). On the determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93 (1), 115-135.

Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81 (3), 525-540.

Lankoski, L. (2009). Differential economic impacts of corporate responsibility issues. Business and Society, 48 (2), 206-224.

Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2014). Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?. The Journal of Finance, 69 (1): 139-178.

Liang, H. & Xintong, Z. (2017). Peer effects of Corporate Social Responsibility. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business. 1-53.

Liu, S. & Wu, D. (2015). Competing by conducting good deeds: The peer effect of Corporate Social Responsibility. Finance Research Letters, 1 (8). (November).

Lundgren, T. (2011). A Microeconomic Model of Corporate Social Responsibility. Metroeconomica 62, (1), 69-95.

Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A., & Walsh, J.P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A metaanalysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working Papers. Harvard Business School, July.

Marquis, C., Glynn, M.A. & Davis, G.F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 925-945.

Martin, R. (2002). The virtue Matrix: Calculating the return on corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 80 (3), 68-75.

McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D.S. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 117-127.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance:

A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403-441.

Pomering, A. & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85 (2), 285-301.

Servaes, H. & Tamayo, A. (2014). How Do Industry Peers Respond to Control Threats? Management Science. 60 (2): 380-399.

Siegel, D.S. & Vitaliano, D.F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16 (3), 773-792.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18381/eq.v17i1.7147

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Copyright (c) 2019 EconoQuantum



EconoQuantum, Año 17, Vol. 17 Núm. 1, enero-junio 2020, es una publicación semestral editada por la Universidad de Guadalajara, a través de la Maestría en Economía y el Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos de la División de Economía del Centro Universitario de Ciencias Económico Administrativas, Periférico Norte # 799, Módulo A-305, Núcleo Los Belenes, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, CP 45100, Tel. (33) 3770 3300 Ext. 25315, http://econoquantum.cucea.udg.mx/, equantum@cucea.udg.mx. Editor responsable: Isaí Guízar Mateos. Reservas de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo No. 04-2006-032411551300-203, ISSN:2007-9869 , otorgados por el Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor. Responsable de la última actualización de este número, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos, División de Economía y Sociedad, CUCEA, Periférico Norte # 799, Módulo A-305, Núcleo Los Belenes, Zapopan, Jalisco, México, CP 45100, por Sandra Ivett Portugal Padilla. Fecha de última actualización, 21 de diciembre de 2019, con un tiraje de un ejemplar.

Las opiniones expresadas por los autores no necesariamente reflejan la postura del editor de la publicación.

Queda estrictamente prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de los contenidos e imágenes de la publicación sin previa autorización de la Universidad de Guadalajara.

 

© 2016 - EconoQuantum - Centro Universitario de Ciencias Económico Administrativas

Periférico Norte No. 799, Núcleo Los Belenes, Módulo A305, C.P. 45100, Zapopan, Jalisco, México. Tel (33) 3770 3300 Ext.25315 Email: equantum@cucea.udg.mx y econoquantum@yahoo.com.mx