Violence in Mexico: An economic rationale of crime and its impacts

  • Enrique Leonardo Kato Vidal Facultad de Contaduría y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.

Resumen

Violence has been identified as an obstacle to economic growth in Mexico, and the purpose of this article is to 1) explain the high rate of homicide in Mexico and 2) estimate the impact of violence on the economy. An equation that is similar to Becker’s equation was defined, and it incorporates the benefits and costs of committing criminal activity; the estimates were performed with a dynamic panel of quarterly data from 32 federal entities. The study shows that a higher sentencing rate could inhibit the emergence of violence, whereas a higher rate of labor participation incentivizes additional criminal activity. In addition, it has been demonstrated that an increase in crime negatively impacts salaries as well as the rate of employers. Despite the strong inertia of violence, the homicide rate may be reduced if the sentencing rate is increased and economic growth is improved, which would reduce unemployment. 

Citas

Arellano, M., and Bond, S. (1991). “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations”. The review of economic studies, 58 (2), 277-297.

Banco de México (various years) “Porcentaje de respuestas respecto a los principales factores que podrían obstaculizar el crecimiento económico en México”, Encuesta sobre las Expectativas de los Especialistas en Economía del Sector Privado, 2010- 2014, Banxico, México.

BBVA Research (2010). “Violence and growth: yes, there is a relationship”. Situación México, BBVA Bancomer, México.

BBVA Research (2011). “The impact of violence in the home, bounded into segments and regions”. Situación Inmobiliaria, BBVA Bancomer, México.

Becker, G. (1993). “Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior”. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385-409.

Bouguignon, F. (1999). “Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries”. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Núm. 44, Universidad de Los Andes, Colombia.

Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G. and Weder, B. (1998). “Economic growth with “incredible” rules: evidence from a worldwide private sector survey”. World Bank Econ. Rev. 12, 353-384.

Drukker, David M. (2008). “Econometric analysis of dynamic panel-data models using Stata”, Summer North American Stata Users Group meeting, July 24-25.

Eide, E. (2000). “Economics of criminal behavior”. Encyclopedia of law and economics, 5, 345-389.

Enamorado, T., Rodríguez-Castelan, C., and López-Calva, L. F. (2013). “Crime and Growth Convergence: Evidence from Mexico”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6730.

Esquivel, G. (2011). “The dynamics of income inequality in Mexico since NAFTA”. Economia, 12, 155-179.

Gaviria, A. and Pagés, C. (2002). “Patterns of crime victimization in Latin American cities”. Journal of Development Economics, 67, 181-203.

Greenberg, D. F. (2001). “Time series analysis of crime rates”. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, 291-327.

Gould, E. D., Weinberg, B. A., and Mustard, D. B. (2002). “Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States: 1979-1997”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84 (1), 45-61.

Haddad, G. K., and Moghadam, H. M. (2011). “The socioeconomic and demographic determinants of crime in Iran (a regional panel study)”. European Journal of Law and Economics, 32 (1), 99-114.

Holmqvist, G. (2000). “Latin American crime and the issue of inequality”. Iberoamericana-Nordic Journal of Latin America and Caribbean Studies, 2, vol. 30, pp. 23-54.

Laing, D. (2011). Labor economics: introduction to classic and the new labor economics. WW Norton & Company.

Medina, F. (2001). “Consideraciones sobre el índice de Gini para medir la concentración del ingreso”. Estudios Estadísticos y Prospectivos 9. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Santiago de Chile.

Mehlum, H., Moene, K. and Torvik, R. (2005). “Crime induced poverty traps”. Journal of Development Economics, 77, 325-340.

Osorio, J. (2011, October). “Dynamic and structural determinants of drug violence in Mexico”. In Violence, Drugs and Governance: Conference on Mexican Security in Comparative Perspective.

Riascos, A. and Vargas, J. F. (2011). “Violence and growth in Colombia: A review of the quantitative literature”. Economics of peace and security journal, 6 (2).

Robles, G., Calderón, G. and Magaloni, B. (2013). “The Economic Consequences of Drug-Trafficking Violence in Mexico”. Poverty and Governance Series Working Paper, Stanford University.

Salama, P., Camara, M. (2007). “Homicidios en América del Sur: ¿son peligrosos los pobres?” Revista Mundo Siglo XXI, 9, 55-67, verano, Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Administrativas y Sociales, IPN, México.

Stata (2013). Longitudinal-Data/Panel-Data Reference Manual, Stata Press, Texas.

Venet, B., and Hurlin, C. (2001). Granger Causality Tests in Panel Data Models with

Fixed Coefficients. Paris Dauphine University.

Publicado
2016-01-19
Cómo citar
Kato Vidal, E. (2016). Violence in Mexico: An economic rationale of crime and its impacts. EconoQuantum, 12(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.18381/eq.v12i2.4862