Victimization and spillover effects in Mexico

  • José N. Martínez Department of Accounting, Finance, and Economics, California State University Dominguez Hills.
Palabras clave: Victimization, crime, Mexico, spillover effects, spatial dependence


Using several rounds of nationally representative victimization survey data, this study examines the determinants of municipality level property crime rates in Mexico and the potential effects of spatial dependence. Baseline results suggest that population size, self-protection rates, and prior victimization rates are the strongest predictors of municipality level property crime. Spatial model results present statistical evidence of spatial dependence in municipality property crime rates. Different specifications suggest that property crime rates are significantly and positively related to crime rates in neighboring municipalities. These effects appear to be growing stronger in more recent years, suggesting increasing spillover effects for property crime in Mexico.


Almeida, E., Haddad, E. y Hewings, G. (2003). The spatial pattern of crime in minas gerais: An exploratory analysis. Economia Aplicada, 9(1): 39-55.

Andresen, M. A. (2006). A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia: A synthesis of social disorganization and routine activity theory. The Canadian Geographer, 50(4): 487-502.

Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer: Academic Publishers.

Anselin, L. (2002). Under the hood: Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 27(3): 247-267.

Anselin, L. y Florax, R. (1995). Small sample properties of tests for spatial dependence in regression models: Some further results. New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, pp. 21-74. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach, Journal of Political Economy, 76: 169-217.

Bernasco, Wim. (2010a). Modeling micro-level crime location choice: Application of the discrete framework to crime at places. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26: 113-138.

Bernasco, W. (2010b). A sentimental journey to crime: Effects of residential history on crime location choice. Criminology, 48(2): 389-416.

Bernasco, W. y Block, R. (2011). Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1): 33-57.

Bourguignon, F. (1999a). Crime, violence and inequitable development. Mimeo, paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, D. C., April 28-30.

Bourguignon, F. (1999b). Crime as a social cost of poverty and inequality: A review focusing on developing countries. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, 44, 61-99.

Cagney, Kathleen A., Christopher R. Browning, Aubrey L. Jackson y Brian Soller.(2013). Networks, neighborhoods, and institutions: An integrated ‘activity space’ approach for research on aging. In Linda J. Waite and Thomas J. Plewes, New Directions in the Sociology of Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, pp. 151-74.

Di Tella, R. y Schargrodsky, E. (2004). Do police reduce crime? estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review, 94(1): 115-133.

Deane, Glen, Messner, Steven F., Stucky, Thomas D., McGeever, Kelly y Kubrin, Charis E. (2008). Not ‘islands, entire of themselves’: Exploring the spatial context of city-level robbery rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24: 363-380.

Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D. y Loayza, N. (2000). Crime and victimization: An economic perspective, Economía, 1(1): 219-302.

Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D. y Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 45(1): 1-40.

Felbab-Brown, V. (2014). Changing the game or dropping the ball? Mexico’s security and anti-crime strategy under president Enrique Peña Nieto, Latin America initiative, foreign policy at Brookings. The Brookings Institution, Washington D. C.

Flores-Lagunes, A. y Schnier, K. E. (2008). Estimation of sample selection models with spatial dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(2): 173-204.

Glaeser, E. L. y Sacerdote, B. (1999). Why is there more crime in cities? Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6): 225-258.

Graif, C. y Sampson, R. J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity in the effects of immigration and diversity on neighborhood homicide rates. Homicide Studies, 13(3): 242-60.

Johnson, S. (2008). Repeat burglary victimisation: A tale of two theories. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4(3): 215-240.

Kubrin, C. E., Messner, S. F., Deane, G., McGeever, K. y Stucky, T. D. (2006). Proactive policing and robbery rates across U.S. cities. Criminology, 48(1): 57-97.

Levitt, S. D. (1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. The American Economic Review, 87(3): 270-290.

MacDonald, J. M. (2002). The effectiveness of community policing in reducing urban violence. Crime Delinquency, 48(4): 592-618.

Messner, S. F., Anselin, L., Baller, R. D., Hawkins, D. F., Deane, G. y Tolnay, S. E. (1999). The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: An application of exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(4): 423-450.

Miethe, T. D, Hughes, M. y McDowall, D. (1991). Social change and crime rates: An evaluation of alternative theoretical approaches. Social Forces, 70(1): 165-185.

Peterson, R. D. y Lauren J. K. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. NewYork: Russell Sage Foundation.

Sagovsky, A. y Johnson, S. D. (2007). When does near repeat burglary victimization occur? The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1): 1-26.

Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D. y Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 443-78.

Smith, W. R, Frazee, S. G. y Davidson, E. L. (2000). Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology, 38: 489-523.

Soares, R. y Naritomi, J. (2010). Understanding high crime rates in Latin America. The role of social and policy factors. The economics of crime. Lessons for and from latin america, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Stretesky, P. B., Shuck, A. M. y Hogan, M. J. (2004). Space matters: An analysis of poverty, poverty clustering, and violent crime. Justice Quarterly, 21: 817-841.

Weisburd, D., Bruinsma, G. J. N. y Bernasco, W. (2009). Units of analysis in geographic criminology: historical development, critical issues, and open questions. In D.Weisburd, W. Bernasco y G. J. N. Bruinsma (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 3-31.

Worrall, J. L. (2005). Reconsidering the relationship between welfare spending and serious crime: A panel data analysis with implications for social support theory. Justice Quarterly, 22: 364-391.

Cómo citar
Martínez, J. (2016). Victimization and spillover effects in Mexico. EconoQuantum, 13(2), 7-31.